I don't like to throw around the "T" word indiscriminately.  It's an ugly word.  It doesn't really roll of the tongue easily.  I suppose that's why we don't hear it very often unless of course liberals can't argue facts (which often get in their way.)  Then they just call you a Nazi, fascist or traitor.  It eases their consciences and makes them feel at one with the universe. 

In case you're wondering what the "T" word is; it's Treason.  With a capital T. 

It's not a word that should be used lightly.  You shouldn't accuse someone of being a traitor just because he, she or it is from the opposite end of the political spectrum, likes cats or is a cross-dresser.  I, like most Americans, associate treason with the infamous Revolutionary War general, Benedict Arnold.  If you didn't sleep through American History class, or are currently attending public school, you'll remember America's most famous traitor.  And I guess that's where we get our standard definition of treason. 

But lately, something hasn't seemed right to me.  When I look at the political landscape in Washington, I see people in government that are doing their very best to bring our country to its knees.  And it's working very well.  Our economy is being bludgeoned and if sanity doesn't prevail, we are about to make deep cuts in our defense spending. That, of course, will go over very big in North Korea and Iran.

Is this part of some sinister master plan or is there something in the water in the DC water system that causes intense stupidity?  Yearning for an answer (I do yearn sometimes), I went to the dictionary to see if there was more to treason than I knew. 

According to the on-line dictionary, the word treason has three meanings:

1. The action of trying to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign. (Doesn't apply here.  Thankfully no one is trying to kill our sovereign.  We don't need a martyr.)
2. A violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.  (Hmm, may apply here.)
3. A betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. (By golly, I think this is the Holy Grail.)

It goes on to expand on number 3:

"Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or (now this is where it gets to the real point):  IMPAIR THE WELL-BEING OF A STATE TO WHICH ONE OWES ALLEGIANCE."

Can anyone tell me that Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the rest of the asylum inmates that are responsible for our massive debt, punitive taxes that are coming, government takeover of industry, banks and the financial markets, and a general ignorance of and disdain for our Constitution, are not impairing the well-being of the state to which they took an oath of allegiance? 

Because I'm trying real hard not to believe that they are traitors. 

But so far, I haven't convinced myself.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered additional protections for Hawaii just in case North Korea launches a long-range missile over the Pacific Ocean.  

Now, what is wrong with me?  I thought that having President Obama in The White House was going to stop all the animosity towards the United States.  Wasn't he going to be The Great Healer, weren't we all just going to live in peace, love and free Fritos?  Weren't we all going to have a group hug and sing Kumbaya?

What happened?  Did we not offer friendship to the little heathens?  Didn't Bill Clinton sell them nuclear technology so that they could have a lamp in every mud hut and a dog in every pot?  

I don't think we've been very sporting about this.  It's our fault that the Dear Leader (I mean the North Korean one, not ours) feels compelled to shoot off ICBMs and detonate nuclear bombs isn't it?  After all, didn't America invade North Korea to start the Korean War.  Oh, sorry not true.  But wasn't it America that bombed Japan to start World War II?  Oh,sorry not true either.  Well there has to be something that makes the North Koreans feel that they need nuclear weapons and the necessary hardware to deliver one to the west coast of America.  

We just haven't done enough for this socialist utopia.  That's the problem.  We just need to give them more stuff.  Everyone needs stuff.  Everyone always wants more stuff.  

So here is my list of the top 10 stuff we can send to Lil Kim in North Korea:

10.   A year's supply of Wheaties.  It is the breakfast of champions you know.
  9.   Matching his and hers sweaters.  It gets mighty cold around that 38th parallel.    
  8. A set of golf clubs.  They actually work well when torturing suspected American spies.
  7. David Letterman.  Enough said.
  6. Michael Moore.  Way more than enough said.
  5. One of those Smart cars.  Hey, why are we the only ones who have to suffer?
  4. Toenail clippers.  For those lonely evenings on the DMZ, nothing beats clipping nails and sipping wine.
  3. Lifetime subscription to O!  Oprah's on his mind!
  2. Ipod with all Barack H. Obama's speeches.  Priceless!

And the number 1 stuff we can send to Lil Kim in North Korea:

      Gift certificate to The Chicken Ranch.  I hear what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.

Maybe this will do the trick.  If not, we can always send an aircraft carrier taskforce.  That might convince him.  It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Last Wednesday evening Inspector General Gerald Wilpin was unexpectedly and unceremoniously let go by the Obama administration.  He received a phone call from the White House Counsel's office telling him he had one hour to either resign or be fired.  He refused to resign.  The next day, his head was handed to him.  And not on a silver platter.

IG Walpin was the inspector general for the AmeriCorps program.  This is the national service program that just got its budget trebled and received $5.7 billion a couple of months ago.  His job is to investigate allegations of stolen money, misspent money, fraud, and other nefarious activities associated with misappropriation of public funds.

Because they often step on some political appointee's or elected official's toes, Congress has given them special protections.  There was a law passed in 2008 that said, if the president wants to fire an IG, he has to give Congress 30 days and show cause for the firing

One of the co-sponsors was none other than then-Senator Barack H. Obama.  Ah, it's so easy to be anti-corruption when you're not the one corrupting.

What got Mr. Walpin in trouble it seems, was that he went after the wrong guy.  Kevin Johnson, a former NBA star and current mayor of Sacramento, California, at one time headed a non-profit group for children called St. Hope. He was accused of misusing thousands of dollars in federal AmeriCorps grant funds.  Mayor Johnson also was a big supporter of and contributor to President Obama.  Mayor Johnson also made millions of dollars as a professional basketball player.  Did he really need to use taxpayer money for his own personal affairs?  Is he really that cheap?

The subsequent investigation by IG Walpin confirmed the allegations.  Mr. Johnson did indeed use federal funds for personal uses.  The report didn't quite please the administration so it seemed action was necessary and they took it.

Now, just in case you think IG Walpin is a Republican hack, I'd like to point out that he prosecuted Roy Cohn (one of Senator Joe McCarthy's bulldogs) and was the person responsible for the indictments against Richard Nixon's cabinet members John Mitchell and Maurice Stans.  So it would be hard to label him as a "vindictive right-wing nut case."

No reason has yet been given for firing Mr. Walpin, but a concerted smear campaign against this dedicated public servant is now being given exposure by an ever-accomodating mainstream media.  They actually have accused him of senility because of his age (he's in his 70s.)  By the way, Teddy (The Swimmer) Kennedy is 78 and Robert KKK Byrd is in his 80s.  Maybe we should fire them.  Dare we hope?

Clearly, our Dear Leader is afraid of IG Walpin.  If he lets him get away with this, other Inspectors General may start looking into other people in the Obama circle of friends.  Maybe some would be a little too close to the president.  Maybe we would find out some things about the new messiah that he doesn't want us to know.

And we can't have the truth about him coming out him, now can we?  

That would just spoil everything.  Maybe even create a crisis that we couldn't let go to waste.  

Obviously, the Iranian election is a sham.  It didn't make any difference how the people voted, the mullahs not only handpicked the contestants; they determined (pre-election) who the winner would be.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the mosque, the people didn't appreciate their votes being made meaningless.  They let the government know it and now more than 100 Iranians are dead.  Their only crime was wanting a fair election process.

We Americans should take note of what's happening half way around the world from us.  And we need to ask ourselves, "How would we react?"  It's a question that we need to answer truthfully, because, although many feel "it can't happen here", it most certainly can.   We are going to have to make a choice:  either make a stand against tyranny or let it conquer us.

We have reached crisis mode in America.  Our Dear Leader is expanding government at a mind-boggling  rate and his personal power is growing right along with it.  He already controls General Motors, Chrysler, AIG, the banks, the investment companies and if he gets control of the healthcare system, he will have dominion over 70% of our nation's economy.  Is that the change you voted for?  No matter your political persuasion, do you really want ONE man with that much power?

This July 4th, we celebrate the 233rd year of our Declaration of Independence.  Literally, hundreds of thousands of brave Americans sacrificed their lives so we could enjoy the rights given to us by God.  Our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to build a nation dedicated to and founded on the ideas of life, liberty and property.  Would you do the same?

It seems as if we have forgotten how and why our nation began.  But it seems the American spirit is more alive in Iran than it is here.  Iranians understand our sacred documents more than we do.

Shouldn't we be the ones protesting the stealing of our children's futures?  Shouldn't we be the ones protesting the destruction of our culture, our economy, our security and our liberty?  

The shame is on us for watching someone else do it. The shame is on us for not paying attention to the truth.  The shame is on us for being cowards.  

The shame is on us for forgetting that we are Americans.

Now that the Los Angeles Lakers have won their 10th NBA championship, the phenomenon known as "Riotus Jerkitis" is playing out in and around Lalaland.

Revelers, basking in the joy of their favorite team's win, threw rocks and bottles at police cars injuring several police officers and damaging police cruisers.   This isn't anything new.  In 2000, after the Lakers won their first NBA title in 12 years, fans rioted, burning police cars and damaging more than 70 vehicles, many at nearby auto dealerships.  More than a dozen people were injured.

Monday, LA Police Chief William Bratton commended his officers for showing restraint despite "a lot of provocation from a number of knuckleheads."

Restraint?  Isn't it about time the police stopped using restraint?  You see, that's the problem.  When I was growing up no one, and I mean no one, ever thought of throwing a rock at a policeman.  Not unless you wanted a good beating.  When you spoke with a policeman it was always, "Yes, sir or no, sir", not some four-letter word (expletive deleted.)  

When a policeman is attacked, whether it be with bottles, rocks or spit, he has a right to physically defend himself.  If that means some out-of-control potato-head gets a bloody nose or busted lip, tough.  Maybe the next time said potato-head meets a police officer he'll be more inclined to be a little more respectful.

Now, I'm not saying that every altercation has to turn into another Rodney King episode, but thanks to the ACLU and like organizations our police and our courts have become ineffective.  You only have to look at the punishment criminals DON"T receive to figure out why our judicial system is upside down and why recidivism to out of control.

The ones who do make it to jail are coddled and well-fed.  They play video games, watch cable tv, have weight rooms and have almost unrestricted access to drugs.  That's punishment? To some, it's like going to Disney World.   

The criminals of today, like our enemies in North Korea and Iran, watch very closely as to how much they can get away with.  The more we give them, the more they will take.  That's not a recipe for fighting crime.  That's a recipe for disaster, and that's what we have in many communities.   

But one man seems to get it.  Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona gets the job done.  His prisoners live in tents with no air conditioning (remember, it's Arizona.)  He banned smoking, coffee, movies, pornographic magazines, and unrestricted TV in all jails. He has the cheapest meals in the U.S. too.  He feeds the inmates baloney sandwiches.  The average meal costs about 15 cents, and inmates are fed only twice daily, to cut the labor costs of meal delivery. He even stopped serving them salt and pepper to save taxpayers $20,000 a year.

He's not called "America's Toughest Sheriff" for nothing.  

Hey, maybe we could get him to move to LA.

Socialism is: The Great Lie - by which everyone can all live at the expense of someone else.

 

The new national health care plan is part of "The Great Lie" for if neither you nor I pay - "Who Pays?"

 

So who pays and how?

 

For if you have "no skin in the game" financially then you will bear costs in some other way: perhaps by reduce choice, or truncated offerings or even the tarnishing of your soul.

 

The "Great Lie" is seductive and politicians use it in the oldest of vote buy schemes yet like some ancient evil, once bitten, victims acquiesce to 'it's spell' and become moral cannibals - moral cannibals feasting on the fruits of others.

 

The guv'ment has no money unless it first takes confiscates it from it's citizens. So when the guv'ment proposes massive new spending we should all ask; "who pays" - if not you and if not me, then who? How?

When the abortion doctor George Tiller was murdered, it made headlines and outrage was everywhere.  Even those of us who disagree with abortion were angered by this senseless killing.  Just as we are by the senseless killing of the unborn.

For days political pundits from the left excoriated those on the right and blamed them for the killing.  Bill O'Reilly especially was viciously attacked, as was Glenn Beck. Chris "The Tingler" Matthews on MSNBC was observed foaming at the mouth.  For days the news/talk shows on tv kept telling us that the murderer was a "right-wing fanatic."  Unfortunately, that was a lie.

In fact James von Brunn was an equal-opportunity hater.  But the fact that he was anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, believed that the US government was behind 9/11 and had in his sights on World Net Daily (a conservative news outlet) somehow didn't seem to get reported.  The media chose instead to "edit" the news.  If you have to ask yourself why, please don't apply for any jobs that require analytical thinking.

The "news" media indicted all of conservatism and made conservatism its scapegoat.  One man committed the murder, but millions of us are to blame.

Contrast that with the murder of Private William Long; an Army recruiter killed by a Muslim fanatic.  How long did we hear that story?  I think all of five minutes and we had to dig to find out the murderer was a Muslim.  Doctor Tiller's murder made the front page, but The New York Times buried Private Long's murder on page 5.  

Did the media blame the rhetoric coming out of Iran for the murder?  How about blaming Al Qaeda or the Muslim schools in America that teach intolerance and hatred and are set-up and financed by our "friend and partner" Saudi Arabia. You wont' see that happen, it doesn't fit the story line.

Just once I would like to see a mainstream media outlet get it right.  The American people certainly deserve better.  And the majority of Americans know better.

Whatever happened to the Fourth Estate; the watchdogs of government; the lie detectors?  It seems politics now triumphs over truth.  If you're George Bush, you're to be hated; if you're Barack H. Obama, well, how can you be against someone who can walk on water AND save the world?  

Journalism has been dying a slow death for more than a decade.  It finally expired in 2008 when it went completely insane and made no attempt to hide its bias for Barack H. Obama.  Even John McCain, who had been the darling of the media for so long because of his pro-illegal immigrant stance and his desire to work WITH the Democrats (that means capitulate) couldn't catch a break from the moronic media moguls.

I unsubscribed to my local newspaper about a year ago.  The only thing it had in it that was based on fact was the crossword puzzle.  Even the sports reporting took a decidedly left turn.  I finally had enough.

Have you?

If you need any further proof that the media is in the tank for Obamessiah, you may be in need of a frontal lobotomy.  Or at the very least a good, swift kick in the ass.  Maybe it would stimulate some brain activity.  

Newsweek editor, Evan Thomas, yesterday said on the MSNBC Chris Matthews show:  

"Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task.  We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above, above the world, he's sort of God."
He's sort of God?  How can you be sort of God?  Is it like being sort of pregnant, or sort of dead?  Maybe it's sort of like being the Vice-President; just waiting around for the Big Guy to go on vacation so you can get your chance to stand in and "change" everything in YOUR image.

By the way, isn't that what Lucifer was looking to do?  How did that work out for him?

Is this really how far this man has brought us in just a short five months?  He is now elevated to the position of being God?  I know he thinks he is the Messiah, but wasn't it just a few  short months ago when asked about when a fetus becomes a human being, he said  "It's above my pay grade?"  

NEWS FLASH:  If you're God, there is nothing above your pay grade!  

Our country, our constitution and our way of life are being eradicated.  Our government has slowly been eroding our rights, given to us by GOD (not our government) and we've stood by and let it happen. It didn't happen overnight. The process has taken many decades and goes back as far as Teddy Roosevelt.  But now we are on the fast-track to total control by an out-of-control government led by a narcissistic demigod.  We've been dumbed down by inferior public education, video games, reality tv shows and sporting events that keep us mesmerized and our focus off the despots that are stealing our children's future.

For those of you who choose not to believe in a divine being, you may not have a choice.  You better be ready to bow down to our Dear Leader, because there will be re-education camps opening soon to make you into dutiful little Obamanites willing to adore and obey the new Lord of The World.

Guess you better buy some kneedpads too.

So, after electing the most un-American President ever, are we really surprised that he is now dismantling the America right before our eyes?

 

Whether by design or by accident, it sure seems as if most actions that "Dear Reader" (B. Hussein Obama) undertakes are in direct conflict with our national character of personal responsibility, free markets and individual liberty.

 

As a gentle reminder, from age six through age ten, "Dear Reader" grew up in a setting that is outside the shared experiences of most Americans. As a matter of fact, while most young Americans were learning about "Truth Justice and the America Way", 'Dear Reader' was learning about something completely different in a Jakarta Muslim school!

 

Growing up without any "particular religious tradition" or the reverse, being inculcated in the church of Jeremiah Wright, Dear Reader has a set of experiences NOT SHARED by the majority of Americans. Perhaps this is why he can so easily reject ideas of our founders and easily ignore the role that Faith played in our founding and should play in our moral governance today.

 

For that matter, attending Columbia University for undergraduate work and Harvard Law School for post grad work also reinforce a set of nontraditional American experiences.  And does underpin many of the "liberal notions" of the "blame America first" crowd; again, these are a set of experiences NOT SHARED with a majority of Americans. Again, perhaps this is why he can so easily reject the "Blessings of Liberty" so dearly earned by our founders (and subsequent generations).

 

As each plank of our shared American foundation is undermined, we drift further away from the principles of our founders and closer to the 'Hope and Change' envisioned by William Ayers, Saul Alinsky, George Soros and Karl Marx.

 

Elections do have consequences and we could have hardly done worse had we elected Stalin himself.

President Obama's speech in Cairo, Egypt today was an eye opener for many reasons and on many levels.

 

He opened his speech with the standard Arabic Muslim greeting, 'As-salam Alaikum', with an eerily uncomfortable familiarity.  When JFK said 'Ich bin ein Berliner', it was understood that  everyone in the West stood against the East in the Cold War.  What does is say when our current President says, 'May Allah's peace be with you', and may imply even more!

 

The true meaning of "As-Salam Alaikum" is not a mere "Hi", "Hello", "How are you" as we are accustomed to using today - it has a much deeper meaning than just a standard greeting. In actuality, there are three meanings for this greeting:

1. As-Salam, as we know, is one of the names of Allah. Thus, when we say "As-Salam Alaikum" we are actually saying that may the trait of Allah (as-Salam or peace and tranquility be upon you and may He protect you;
2. As-Salam is also in the meaning of submission or surrender. Thus, when we say "As-Salam Alaikum" we are actually saying that we submit to what you would like for us to do (obviously within the limits of the Shariah);
3. As-Salam is also in the meaning of protection or safety. Thus in this meaning, when we greet another believer with "As-Salam Alaikum" we are actually guaranteeing our believing brother or sister protection from any evil from ourselves and that we will not do a single thing to harm them - either physically or even spiritually. Not only would we not harm them with our hands, but we will also not cause them grief with our tongue...

 From 'http://masooma.blogspot.com/2008/01/meaning-of-as-salam-alaikum.html'

 

Shake off your outdated Christian American ideology for a moment and axe yourself, just what was PBO saying to the audience and the world at Cairo University?  Did his famous smile and wink, after saying 'Salam Alaikum'   he really mean 'Peace be unto you.', or did it really belie his emerging policy of  submission and surrender?

 

He introduced himself as Barack Hussein Obama, something he never did during his campaign.  Those that did use his full name were chastised by the media.  He gave his lineage as a Kenyan father whose history was Muslim, while during his campaign, his father was just 'Black'.    Apparently now he is revealing his true self, and of course, the media will not take him to task for these contradictions.

 

 He excoriated Israel for their settlements in land they conquered (in the same 'accepted' fashion by which most nations grew:  war).  He promoted a Palestinian state, at the expense of Israel, as the solution for the tensions in the Mid-East.  He denigrated our ally and the only true democracy in the Middle-East.

 

Have you yet questioned this guys intentions?  They are becoming clearer by the day.  I quote from his Cairo speech:

 

 'So let there be no doubt, Islam is a part of America'

'I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.'

 'I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear'

'The U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.'

'When the first Muslim-American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, kept in his personal library.'  (Thomas Jefferson acquired this Koran to understand the mind of his enemy, the Barbary Pirates.  He was not an admirer of Islam as PBO would have your believe.)

 

I have a number of Jewish friends.  I have yet to figure out why they, by-in-large, vote Democrat.  Regardless, I am hearing an immense dissatisfaction with 'Democrat' PBO among them.  They might not be Republicans, but they are not Socialists and certainly not believers in Islam.  They are not happy with PBO's idea of a separate Palestinian state.  Their points:

 

Why is the construct of a divided Israel the only solution?  Why not go back further and look to the history of the area, such as the Trans-Jordan,  the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and the U.N. partition plan of 1947.

 

There never was a country of Palestine.  It was just a reference to an area of the Ottoman empire.  Palestine became Trans-Jordan as a remnant of the Ottoman empire after WWI.  It included what is now Israel, Jordan and some of the Sinai.  Colonial Britain gained authority.   

 

European Jews, suffering from discrimination and pogroms, had migrated to the area since the late 1800's.  Britain could not control it.  Therefore, the Balfour Declaration stated it was in the interest of the British Empire to  create a Jewish state in Palestine.  It did not happen until the  creation of the United Nations after WWII and the Partition Plan of 1947. 

 

Britain, wanted out.  The Zionists wanted in.  And the Syria and Jordan's Hashemite kings did not want  nomadic Palestinians in their kingdoms.

 

The British got out.  The Zionists got in and got attacked by Syria, Jordan and Egypt, and won.  Syria and Jordan used the confusion of war to exile their  Palestinians into the new Israel.

 

So why is the so-called 'Palestinian Question' a question only for Israel?  Both Jordan and Syria contributed to the original problem.  They need to repatriate their exiles as part of the solution.

 

Now that PBO is revealing his true identity, we all should each examine our own personal politics.

               

Are we actually ' one of the largest Islamic countries in the world', or did  we become a great nation based on our founding by Christian men with Christian beliefs?

 

Does America need to apologize for its actions since 9/11?  Should we also apologize for military actions that benefited Muslims?  Defeating the Ottomans in  WWI, Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq?  And, feeding Somali's or the Indonesian (actually, the largest Muslim country) victims of the 12/26/2004 tsunami.

 

How many of your individual freedoms are you willing to cede to PBO's government of change in pursuit of your perceived improved happiness?

 

 There was a question on the Florida Concealed Weapons applications:  'Have you renounced your American citizenship?'  The only answers were Yes or No.

 

 I wanted to say 'Not Yet!'

This is worth watching - again!
 

The other day, President Obama's Secretary of Energy, Dr. Steven Chu, was speaking at the St. James' Palace Nobel Laureate Symposium" in London (that's in England for those of you in public school.) giving a speech on global warm...oh excuse me, I mean global climate change of course, when he told this distinguished group of Nobel prize winners that we should paint much of the world white to reflect heat back into space and so cure global warming, er, I mean global climate change.  

Huh!

I didn't make this up honest.  I know it sounds like lunacy, but what else would you expect from an Obama appointee.  This guy might actually be funnier than Joe Biden!  He actually went on to say that building regulations should insist that all flat roofs be painted white, and visible tilted roofs could be painted with "cool-colored" paints that looked normal, but which absorbed much less heat that conventional dark surfaces.  Roads could be lightened to a concrete color so they would not dazzle drivers in bright sunlight.  Hang on a second please, I'm laughing so hard, I can't typ........

OK, I'm done.  Now let's get down to some serious business.  I want to help the environment.  I'm not mean, I like polar bears and Frosted Flakes.  So here are my Top 10 suggestions to combat global warm, darn, I mean global climate change.

10. Let's cover the dark blue world's oceans with a thick layer of non-fat plain yogurt.  It's nice and white.  Added plus, if the fish eat it, they'll all live to be 100 years old!

9. Put giant mirrors on all skyscrapers and aim them at Pluto.  The planet could use a little warming           up.

8. No more black or brown shoes.  Only white.  White belt optional (no black socks with shorts.)

7. Everyone dress in white clothes during the day.  Better bring extra anti-perspirant though.

6. No more lawns.  Just big patches of white sand.

5. The only car colors are white or chrome.  Dazzling!

4. Pick the leaves off of every tree.

3. Everyone wears tin foil on his head to reflect the sun's rays.  Tin foil can be very creative.

2. No tin foil?  People with dark hair shave their heads.  Blondes you're exempt.

And the number 1 suggestion:

Black folks (and people with suntans) can only go out at night.

There you have it.  My 10 simple solutions to save the planet from global warm, I mean GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE!

Since 2001, I have been blogging about the deleterious effects of a dumbed-down electorate here, Sea Change ,and just last year here Captives in O'Babylon

and earlier this year here You Lost

 

Now the chickens are coming home to roost and as the saying goes "you can't see the forest for the trees" - 'cause sometimes you are just to close. Core tenets of our founding are being disregarded without oversight from the press, the American people or even Congress.

 

Yet in the old adage "it takes one to know one" American is being called out as going communist by none other than - Pravda !

 

 

America - as we know it, is being dismantled right before our eyes by "thugocrats", who don't know and who don't care how America works. And in its place will be "Change" - a new America where the "thugracy" stifles dissent, aggrandizes itself and friends  and chases a long ago failed concept of "social justice" where believes that they can live at the expense of someone else. And

 

Sadly it seems,  the only ones recognizing this collapse is the former propaganda wing of the old Union Soviet Socialist Republics - Pravda.

 

Americans should be marching on Washington - pitchforks and torches in hand to take back our country from those who have obviously forsaken their oath to the Constitution! Instead we will have a ring side seat for as the saying goes; "As goes General Motors so goes the Nation!" Our future holds Bankruptcy, and what meager assets are left will be picked over by our creditors.   謝謝

The new GM General Motors Guv'ment Motors, stolen from the bondholders of the old GM!

Like some bizarre time warp from the Weimar Republic or a Venezuelan junta, we have the government forcing companies into bankruptcy and subordinating senior creditors (bond holders) to junior creditors (the union - a branch of Gettelfinger's UAW thugocracy ).

And like a reverse boomerang, the stock market is raising on a tide that will soon be large enough to drown future generations in tsunami debt - forever indentured to guv'ment plantation.

This is a historical theft of personal liberty. Unbelievable that this is happening in the United States of America!

A sad day indeed.