Recently in Taxes Category
The
changing American psyche from the concepts of independence and self reliance to
the ideas of dependence and government subsidy is due in large part to the New Deal
and the manifesto it inspired: that the
government can and should solve your problems. . .
Those
advancing the New Deal manifesto are also the same pusillanimous characters who
are snared by the fallacious argument that 'we can all live at the expense of
someone else'. However, this is a belief absent from our founder's documents
and until public schools elevated FDR to near sainthood and the New Deal to
nearly a sacrament these beliefs were absent from the American concepts of self
too.
Never has this
belief that that the government can and
should solve your problems been more dangerous for our country that what we
have been witnessing for the past few days.
The market,
rocked by an ever more serious series of trials - not the least of these include
the Fannie Mae Bailout, Porkulus, and as if to add insult to injury: Mortgage Relief
has been on a 2000 point tank since Dear Leader was inaugurated. It is as if
the last eight years of sweat, blood, hard work, toil and travails have been undone in the last
month. What it took all Americans 8 years to build Dear Leader, Pelois and Reid
destroyed within their first 30 days of office. Can you image what the next 4
years will be like?
And now, as
if Hugo Chavez is the president of the
Hardworking
Americans deserve - no, have earned better treatment than this; but alas we are
in for more punishment while bad behavior- okay fraudulent gaming the system
behavior is celebrated, uplifted, even rewarded. And as if some by some act of
cosmic cruelty, the undeserving will be rewarded by dollars confiscated from us!

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested on
Tuesday the world was breathing a sigh of relief that President Barack Obama
had replaced George W. Bush and was working to fix the damage he had caused.
Source.
"Elections have consequences" and whether most
Americans knew it or not, they've elected people who DO NOT HAVE
"Dear Leader" penned in his book Audacity;
"I will stand with the them [Muslims] should the political winds shift in
an ugly direction" . . he went on to opine that "Judeo-Christian
heritage will recede as an all-religions country emerges". Not only is "dear
leader" demonstrating a willingness to abandon American policies abroad; but,
eager to bring about a tectonic shift in culture here at home. He, his
congressional myrmidons and his following are 'legion'. Yet we slumber - blissfully ignorant.
Even while we allot scant attention, the House of
Representatives, under the guise of "Stimulus" are preparing to foist upon the
American taxpayer "the invoice" to pay for the tectonic cultural and value
shift - in the form of House Bill "HR1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009".
This stimulus bill will cost the American Taxpayer
more than the
So the Reuters' story proclaims, Government aid could save US newspapers. source . . .Is it just me or is this some sort of quid pro quo for helping 'O-bominate' the nation?
Newspapers are failing in many cities in the

So in addition to the probable reprise of the Fairness Doctrine, we'll have 'guv-ment' supported, soviet style newspapers, echoing the 'progressive' ruminations of BHO, Pelosi and Reid. All the while the pro 'guv-ment' propaganda is being distributed to that segment of the populace eager for "more from others" while being funded by those "very others" that do the paying - the tax payer. Regrettably, this confiscatory tax scheme more closely resembles a criminal enterprise extorting protection money than payments for services the taxpayer actually receives.
Ironic that the beggar-vote in this country will continue to have their "entitlement belief system" reinforced through an ongoing conspiracy to deliver approved "Newspeak" all at the expense of the rest of us. So in the greatest of thefts, we the taxpayer, are actually being forced to pay to disseminate the idea that others are entitled to that which we have earned.
Okay, so the Apostles of Ignorance have outdone themselves today!
With a sputtering economy and companies shedding jobs like a sycamore in a snow storm, Congress has decided to say "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche" - "Let them eat cake"!
In a move that would make Marie Antoinette seem like the great philanthropist, Lawmakers have determined they deserve a pay raise. Quickly, overlooking the fact that they had the chance to do the "right thing" and freeze their pay, instead, Lawmakers "pimped their pocketbooks" and voted themselves a raise.
While I supposed we should take heart that congresses has confidence that there will indeed some taxpayers left and we all won't be in breadlines, this certainly is a biter pill to swallow when 2 million Americans have lost their jobs - so far this year.
The hypocrisy of these "congressional confiscators" is unbelievable, their "over-the-top" histrionics while forcing auto exec to accept a one dollar a year salary - yes, I mean a buck a year - is beyond any sane understanding. And it's obvious that their hubris knows no bounds. It's okay for us to "tighten our belts" yet their ever expanding appetite for our money shows no sign of satiation.
Instead of representatives, we now seem to have "Washingtonian monsters" whose hunger for money and the power it buys is unquenchable.
Regrettably we just missed the most recent opportunity to make things right with the voter's equivalent of 'pitchforks and torches' known as the ballot box. Will it be too late to set things right in 2010? And, with such Congressional Jackassery on proud display, when might the need arise to switch the ballot box for the real pitchforks and torches to chase these monsters out of office?
Taxes verses Services - Guns verses Butter, similar argument differing context.
In our local paper the Orlando Sentinel - one of the bankrupt properties of the Tribune Company [earlier Harangue] - who never met a 'socialist cause' it didn't embrace, is now reporting "Florida faces stark choice: Taxes vs. services". Source
Of course the real problem is that the state has promised too many goodies to those who aren't paying for them and is telling the rest of us, the taxpayers - which is an ever shrinking number - mind you, that we "'gotta' pay more"!!!
As an example:
That fact that they payer-vote is already paying double and sometimes triple for some services - already should be enough to stop the "Jeopardy Clock"; but, regrettably it's not. For example: your public school system delivers a defective product - in that 50% of those graduating can't read and at least 30% of the students drop out before graduation - so you send your kinds to private school to offset the dumb-mass gap. You are force to pay twice: once on your tax bill, then on your children's tuition. Then the school board in it's infinity wisdom decides it needs more administrators and a new building to house them in so they impose an impact fee on new construction essentially taxing new home buyers a third time for the same defective services.
Another example of what Frederic Bastiat wrote; "the state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else" [so who owns you?]
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."
The preceding is a petition that has been signed by over 19,000 American scientists. I might add that none of them have asked for, or received government grants totaling $2 billion to study "global warming." Also, for the record, the warmest year on record was 1997. Between 1997 and 2001 the average global temperature per year either remained steady or declined. From 2001 to the present, average global temperatures have steadily declined. Now we are being told by the "global warming" alarmists it is a sign that it really is getting warmer. What! That's like saying that Exxon's huge profits really indicate that it's losing money. Duh!
In spite of the evidence, the incoming administration and the overwhelmingly Democratic Congress has said that combating "global warming" will be its number one priority. Hold onto your wallets folks, the taxman cometh.
We're through the looking glass Alice.
Like a shark dive without the cage, our Trotskyite inspired congress is swimming through the ocean of 'red (and black) inked' businesses - jaws agape - filter feeding high and low along the corporate food chain. Swallowing whole, businesses to "big to fail" and extorting equity partner positions among the 'small fry' easy enough to bully and mollify. Like Tony Soprano with more leverage - bada bing!
Just a few years ago - heck - even a few months ago, such a tectonic shift from a free-market to socialism seemed nigh on impossible in our beloved Republic.
Now the Bolsheviks cry: bailout - bailout - bailout - the revolution begins and is over without a whimper, without a shot being fired - only a sigh for what once was. If most Americans held a better appreciation for the "noble call" of commerce, this state of affairs could not be allowed to stand.
Instead, we have a population that doesn't understand or "misunderstands" the purpose of business and its role in society.
Regrettably, most workers just assume that the purpose of business - any business - is to give them a job. And if that job goes away - no big deal - they'll just get another job. And if that job goes away, well then there's always the "gov'ment" to turn to.
Just as many don't understand business; it evident that they understand the role of our government even less. Consequently, we just had 52 million Americans vote for a presidential candidate promising goodies from the public treasury.
What every American needs to know:
The government does NOT HAVE except that which it takes from others. In order for the government to give you a dollar - it MUST first take it away from someone else. . . Not fair, Not moral; but that's the way it is.
- 2nd Amendment (5)
- 52-48 (5)
- Advent (1)
- Anarchy (4)
- Apostles of Ignorance (9)
- Big Government (36)
- Big Labor (5)
- Congress (11)
- Culture Wars (1)
- E.U. - European Union (2)
- Economy (6)
- Elections 2000 (3)
- Elections 2008 (17)
- Elections 2009 (1)
- Elections 2010 (1)
- Eminent Domain (1)
- Energy (1)
- Faith (13)
- Global Warming (1)
- Government Force (7)
- Healthcare? (5)
- Lagniappe (52)
- Media (8)
- National Socialism (4)
- Our Republic (51)
- Patriotism (6)
- Social-ism (41)
- Societal de-Evolution (25)
- Taxes (12)
- Tea Party (1)
- Terror-ism (5)
- Voter Fraud (6)
- Western Civilation (3)
- edu-K-shon (3)
- more - Political- corruption (12)