I think I may have stumbled across (my brain is actually quite good at
stumbling) a way to make inroads into the black vote so heavily hooked
into voting for Democrats.
Blacks are overwhelmingly socially
conservative. Something like 70+% are against abortion, gay marriage,
etc. Why do conservatives not point out that there are roughly 300,000 black
babies murdered every year by being aborted. Since 1973 when the
Supreme Court made the controversial ruling Roe v Wade that allowed
abortion, more than 11 million black babies have been killed. That's almost
twice the number of innocent lives lost than during The Holocaust.
This from the on-line dictionary: genocide |ˈjenəˌsīd| noun the deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation.
If
300,000 blacks being murdered each year isn't
genocide, then maybe we need a new definition. It's not Republicans or conservatives
that are in favor of this. In fact, Margaret Sanger, a Democrat and
founder of Planned Parenthood, had as her sole purpose of founding the
organization the "thinning of the herd" of blacks in this country. She
appealed to groups like the KKK.
"I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku
Klux Klan...I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and
illuminated crosses...I was escorted to the platform, was introduced,
and began to speak...In the end, through simple illustrations I believed
I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered." (Margaret Sanger: An Autobiography, P.366)
And
who supports Planned Parenthood today? Why that would be the Democrat
Party. The same party that formed the KKK, passed Jim Crow laws and
seceded from the Union because slavery was being threatened. Maybe it's
time we told the truth about Democrats.
Maybe we can convince some black Americans that they're being taken for a ride...and to the ovens.
I have not been one to buy into the
whole "birther" movement that claims Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural
born American and thereby not eligible to serve as President of The United
States.This isn't because I
whole-heartedly believe that President Obama was born in Hawaii, but more
because I have not seen any definitive proof that he was not.And in a court of law, that's
enough for reasonable doubt.
In addition, there are facets to
this story that make me cringe every time I hear or read about Obama's
ineligibility.Primarily
because this is major distraction from the damage this man has done and continues to do to our nation.The longer we
focus on this non-issue, the less time we spend talking about the real harm he
is doing.This provides easy cover
for him as he goes about his nefarious activities in his quest to "fundamentally change The United States of America."The more the birthers try to convince
us of his ineligibility, the more they look like loons and the Obama-mania
media is happy to paint all conservatives with this broad brush.I believe that is the reason why it
took more than two years to produce an official birth certificate.The more this distracted us, the more the president and his minions could get away with.And they got
away with plenty.
Also, if the birthers expect Obama
to be impeached, they are obviously on some kind of happy drug, because it will
not happen.The Senate is where
the impeachment will be held and the Democrats control it.Does anyone in their right mind expect
the Dems to vote against their idol?Of course, the answer is no.Not to mention the fact that if Obama were ever to be impeached, there
would be a race war in this nation.No one wants that.Case
closed on impeachment.
Having said all that, I've come
upon a video that was made by a young man well-versed in Adobe Photoshop.I will not expound on the details of
the video.Suffice it to say, that
it is a little more than interesting.
For those of you who know me, you
can attest to the fact that when it comes to computers, I am living in the
Stone Age.I freely admit that I
do not easily comprehend things like Photoshop so I questioned what was being
shown.Fortunately, I know people
far smarter than I.So I called them.It seems that everything put forth in
this video is indeed possible and may very well be accurate.
In the
end, you'll just have to judge for yourself.
It seems like the Chi-Coms have a serious problem with their watermelon population. Lately, our little Red friends have experienced a plethora of inexplicable watermelon explosions. Once thought to be the exclusive domain of comedian Gallagher and his Sledge-O-Matic, exploding fruits have now taken center stage in the hallowed halls of the world's largest, and (thanks to an embracing of a capitalist economy) richest Marxist utopia.
It seems the culprit is the rampant misuse of pesticides, fertilizers and food additives, all designed to "enhance" the attractiveness of the produce and boost sales. Hmm, it seems like our biggest creditor and newest big-toe has added yet another to its list of exports that undercut American products through cheap labor and manipulated currency, and flood our Wal-Marts with cheap (and unsafe) consumer goods.
Is it any wonder that a nation that was ruled for three decades by the tyrannical despot, Mao Tse Tung, has an abhorrent record of abuses when it comes to product safety? After all, he murdered somewhere between 70 and 100 million Chinese without batting an slanted eyelash, so is it such a stretch to think that his successors would necessarily care if they poisoned half the population of earth?
China's record of safety in the marketplace is abysmal. From the lead-painted toys, melamine-laced dog food, powdered milk and candy to the lead-laden baby bibs and tainted drywall installed in many construction projects, America has been inundated with hazardous materials because of our thirst for inexpensive goods from the Chinese workers paradise.
Who's to blame? The Chinese manufacturer or farmer; the exporters/importers; the bureaucrats who oversee the transactions?
Or how about you? How many times do you look for the "Made in USA" label? How many times have you been willing to spend an extra dollar to buy American? How many of you buy "Made in China" without a thought of where your money goes; to whom it goes; and what it's spent on?
Maybe it's time you took your responsibility seriously. If you don't, who will?
Now that Barack Hussein Obama has finally come clean and put to rest
what most of the people in America already knew; that he actually was
born in the United States, I now hear talking heads wondering loudly
"Why did he wait so long?"
Are they that stupid that they can't
see right through Jon Stewart's President "Dude"? Our Immaculated
Monarch is as transparent as Saran Wrap and all the so-called people
"in-the-know" have their blinders on.
Obama spent upwards of $2
million over the past 2 1/2 years trying to conceal the fact that he was
really, really born here and really, really was the president,
while the birthers spent all that time pre-occupied with a non-issue. I
have to say this was a brilliant strategy on the part of BHO. I never
want to hear anyone call this community organizer stupid again. What's a cool
$2 mil anyway? Especially when it's not your money!
His strategy enabled
him to pass an unconstitutional health mandate, against the wishes of
the vast majority of Americans and a trillion-dollar stimulus bill that
was supposed to create jobs but mainly bailed out unions (who donated
heavily to his campaign.) He filled the White House with advisers, that
even in the Carter Administration would have been ostracized for their
Marxist leanings, and managed to take control of the financial sector and
General Motors. All the while keeping our attention focused on his
double-secret probational birth certificate. With glazed-over eyes, our
attention was riveted on his left hand while behind his back
his right hand was galvanizing his troops to bring down the American
Empire. Because, after all, America is no more exceptional than
Germany, or England, or Uganda.
So why show it now? He could
have kept us in the dark forever. No one was going to force him to show
it.
Hawaiian law forbids it from being released. The Supreme Court of The
United States has been avoiding this issue for months. All
the lawsuits seeking the release of this Holy Grail had been thrown out
of numerous courts.
So what
pressure was put upon him to show it at this particular time?
If you'll take your glazed eyes off the left hand, you'll find out.
I had a most interesting Monday morning (I guess interesting is as good an adjective as any.) Anyway, I had the opportunity to attend a hearing on the direction of funding for transportation in the United States. It was chaired by the Chairman of the House Transportation Committee, who happens to be my congressman, John Mica.
The panel hosting the hearings included three Democrats and two Republicans, so I guess you could say it was bi-partisan. Although, definitely not non-political. One of the Democrat panelists couldn't help getting in a dig in at Governor Rick Scott's veto of the high speed rail proposal for Florida. Governor Scott is against the billion-dollar boondoggle because he believes that ultimately the taxpayers of Florida will end up footing the bill; over and over and over again. (On a side note, Congressman Mica has been pushing high-speed rail for many years now and his panel of "experts" were all in favor of his pet project. What kind of hearing is it where you only hear one side of the argument?)
Any reasonable person can look at the recent history of passenger rail systems in America and come to no other conclusion. Let me point to Amtrak. Last year, it lost $32 per passenger. Or how about The Sunset Limited, which travels between New Orleans and Los Angeles? It lost $462 per passenger. The government, rather you and I, subsidize these failing operations. Yet, these folks want more failures so they can squander more of our hard-earned money.
The Congressperson in favor of said squandering and that belittled our governor was none other than Corinne Brown-Democrat, Jacksonville. Her district flows from Northeast Florida to Orlando. A gerrymandered district any corrupt politician would love. For those of you who aren't familiar with Ms. Brown, she is the lady of fame that requested the city of Jacksonville public works employees place sandbags around her home to protect if from rising floodwaters (when the city had no plans to place sandbags at anyone's home.) At no cost to her I might add.
In her opening statement, she wondered aloud how Governor Scott could reverse direction on the rail proposal simply because of an election. Well, Ma'am (if I can use the term) let me quote another politician who changed the direction of a nation because of an election. He simply said "We won!" But I guess winning means never having to say you're sorry (unless you're a Republican.)
Knowing Ms. Brown's penchant for sticking her foot in her mouth, this piqued my interest and I was suddenly aroused from the ennui that had already set in. I quickly remembered her statement about gerrymandering (the politically influenced method that creates biased elections and created the meandering district that allows her to belch inanely from the House of Representatives.)
"Do you know who Gerry Mandering was?" She related during an interview on a local radio station. "He was a white legislator that had a lot of power," she was quoted as saying. "And what we want to make sure is everybody has a fair opportunity to have representation in the United States Congress. In the House, the Senate, the city council and the school boards." I didn't know that city councils and school boards were part of the US Congress. But I guess that's a minor point.
Gerry Mandering? Actually, Elbridge Gerry was a Massachussetts Gov. and former U.S. Vice President, who in 1812 signed a law that created a district that was said to look like a salamander. Thus, the term gerrymander came into our lexicon.
Ms. Brown was awarded a Specialist in Education degree from the University of Florida. Don't you just love it when higher education pays off? That makes me want to look harder at my daughter's diploma since she graduated from UF.
As the Congresswoman continued her diatribe to convince the crowded hall of numb constituents that she actually knew what she was talking about, she said something that made my nose hairs curl. In making her case for high-speed rail, she said (and I quote) "For every billion dollars the federal government spends, it creates 44,000 jobs." Now I let that sink in for all of four seconds before I said to myself, "WHAT?"
So I thought, hmm, if the government can create 44,000 jobs from a cool billion dollars, how many jobs could it create with 787 of those freshly printed, but worthless billions? Since I didn't have a calculator with me, I was forced to do a little quick math in my now pulsing brain. Let's see, 44,000 times 787. Why that means that the government could have created 34,000,000+ jobs from that economic "stimulus" passed just months after President Obama took office. Now the last time I checked we had roughly 14,000,000 unemployed. That means we could actually make room for twenty million more illegal immigrants to come in and work. It's a win, win for everyone!
But now that my brain is starting to boil over from all those zeroes, I have to wonder: We still have close to 10% unemployment so how exactly does arithmetic work in Washington; or at least in Congresswoman Brown's mind. Because the numbers don't add up. Except, of course, in The Land of Make Believe.
I think the majority the tax paying voters have understood all along what the President has been communicating. They just demonstrated quite clearly, they wanted no part of what he was offering - vis-a-vis town hall meetings, Restoring America assemblies and Tea Parties.
I mean, after 54 speeches on healthcare, how could Mr. President, Dear Leader Reader think he hasn't communicating his message effectively?? =:o
Just when you thought you'd heard every idiotic statement from a politician possible, another comes along and it's "Hey honey, where's that case of duct tape? My head is going to explode."
Today's recipient of the "I'm trying to get my foot out of my mouth, but it's difficult" award (formerly held by Joe Biden) goes to Nevada's senior senator, Harry "King of the World" Reid. You see the venerable Nevadan has taken credit for keeping the world from a depression. Not just the US mind you, but the WHOLE world!
From
the "you can't make this up" file, President Obama is turning NASA into his
Muslim-outreach agency. According to Fox News, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden says that
NASA's foremost mission in 2010 is to improve relations with the Muslim world.
You
might want to push instant replay and read that again just to make sure
you're awake.
He
went on to say, "[w]hen I became the NASA administrator - or before I
became the NASA administrator - [President Obama] charged me with three
things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get
into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international
relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a
way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with
dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic
contribution to science . and math and engineering."
Huh?
We want our space program to concentrate on making Muslims "feel good"
about themselves? Can someone explain to me why this was the "foremost"
mission our Dear Leader directed at NASA? Not replacing the aging
Shuttle fleet? No no, not that. How about building our own space
station? Uh-uh, can't do that. Umm, how about going back to the moon.
Sorry, not going to happen. But we do want Muslims to feel good about
their rich history of........? Let's see, they did invent our numeric
system right? Oh no, wrong. Our numbers came to us via Indian/Arabic
culture around 300 BC (that's Before Christ for those of you in public
school.) That was more than 1,000 years before Mohammed starting
lopping off heads to bring us the religion of peace.
Okay,
then they invented the telescope right? Oh sorry, a man named Hans
Lipperhey invented the telescope. He was born in Wesel,
Germany and made his home in Middleburg, part of the Zeeland province
in the Netherlands.
Alright,
how about the pendulum? Wrong again, that pesky Italian Galileo
Galilei invented that between inventing everything else in Europe. How
about the clock? Nope, the ancient Eqyptians. The watch? No again.
The compass? Nope, Chinese. Gunpowder? Double no, our good friends
and T-bill holders the Chinese again.
And
as to Mr. Bolden's assertion that Muslims invented mathematics and
engineering. Well, not so much. Actually, no single person invented
mathematics. Mathematical systems have been
developed by different cultures independently. The mathematics in western civilization can mostly be traced to roots in Mesopotamia, Egypt
(especially for geographical use) and Babylon (especially for
astronomical use). All cultures that preceded Islam. And call me
crazy, but I'm pretty sure engineering began in ancient Egypt with the
building of the pyramids. Again preceding Islamic culture by many
millennia.
Well,
they must have invented something, after all, they must be made to feel
proud about something!
I can't take credit for this as much of this is taken from
an article written by Scott Wheeler from The National Republican Trust
political action committee:
On June 9, President Obama announced a 400 million dollar
aid package to the West Bank and Gaza, which are currently two separate
entities; the West Bank under the control of Mahmoud Abbas, a moderate by
radical Islamic standards, Gaza is run by the democratically elected Islamic
Resistance Movement known otherwise as the terrorist group Hamas. Obama was
trying to be sneaky in announcing this "aid package" to Gaza with Abbas present
thus conflating the moderate with the radical terrorist group Hamas, a clear
attempt to avoid scrutiny of handing over American's money directly to a
terrorist organization that has murdered American citizens. Whatever else you
can say about Obama, at least he never forgets his friends. Thanks to the
investigative work of Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs we know that in 2007
Obama's campaign received over 30 thousand dollars in illegal donations from
Hamas controlled Gaza.
Curious is the timing of Obama's announcement. Israel had
just taken action against ships attempting to break its blockade of Gaza, which
was put into place to stop the flow of weapons and war supplies that Hamas uses
to attack Israelis. And Obama joined the rest of the Islamic world in
condemning Israel for taking action to defend itself against terrorists who have
not only killed Americans and Israelis but have declared that it would drive
the Jews into the Mediterranean Sea.
Since 2001, the United States has listed Hamas as a
"Specifically Designated Global Terrorist" organization. The sanctions for
providing support for a SDGT are harsh.
Even the New York Times, which is as a rule sympathetic to
terrorists, stated "The details of how the aid would be used in Gaza remained
unclear. Nor was it immediately clear how Mr. Abbas, who has authority in the
West Bank but not in Gaza would be able to administer it."
But, according to the Times, "White House officials said the
money would be spent on housing, schools, efforts to provide access to drinking
water and other health and infrastructure projects." Of course, with Americans
providing all of their financial needs it frees up Hamas' other money to buy
weapons and afford them more sophisticated means by which to smuggle them into
the strip, no more raggedy flotillas for these terrorists.
Obama also used the occasion to attack Israel's blockade
"there should be some way of focusing narrowly on arms shipments rather than
focusing in a blanket way on stopping everything and then, in a piecemeal way,
allowing things into Gaza." Even Obama himself acknowledges that supplies still
get to the Gazans, Israel just searches the incoming vessels to insure that the
cargo isn't going to be used to kill people. Apparently Obama thinks there is
some other magical way to find the weapons among the "humanitarian supplies"
other than looking through them. Here's a thought; how about you get no
supplies at all until you stop smuggling weapons and murdering innocent
civilians?
The Times reports that international aid organizations
"working in Gaza have warned of growing hardship. Deprived of raw materials,
local industry has been severely damaged, and the Gaza economy has collapsed."
This account seems to suggest that the poor Gazans have absolutely no control
over their situation, the fact is though that they went to the polls and freely
elected Hamas agents to run Gaza. These poor victims elected representatives
for themselves whose stated objective is to annihilate the Jews. But we should
feel sorry for them anyway, Obama and the liberals here tell us the most evil
crime in the world is racial discrimination and yet they take our money and
give it to people whose sole objective for their existence is to exterminate a
race of people. Welcome to Obama's world.
It needs to be pointed out that despite attacks by Hamas,
Israel maintains an ongoing humanitarian corridor for the transfer of
perishable and staple food items to Gaza. This conduit is used by
internationally recognized organizations including the United Nations and the
Red Cross.
Well over a million tons of humanitarian supplies entered
Gaza from Israel over the last 18 months equaling nearly a ton of aid for every
man, woman and child in Gaza. Millions of dollars worth of international food
aid continually flows through the Israeli humanitarian apparatus, ensuring that
there is no food shortage in Gaza.
Food and supplies are shipped from Israel to Gaza six days a
week. These items were channeled through aid organizations or via Gaza's
private sector.
Large quantities of essential food items like baby formula,
wheat, meat, dairy products and other perishables are transferred daily and
weekly to Gaza. Fertilizers that cannot be used to make explosives are shipped
into the Strip regularly, as are potato seeds, eggs for reproduction, bees, and
equipment for the flower industry.
In 2009 alone, more than 738,000 tons of food and supplies
entered Gaza. Pictures in local newspapers show local markets aplenty with
fruit, vegetables, cheese, spices, bread and meat to feed 1.4 million Gazans.
In the first quarter of 2010 (January-March), 94,500 tons of
supplies were transferred in 3,676 trucks to the Strip: 48,000 tons of food
products; 40,000 tons of wheat; 2,760 tons of rice; 1,987 tons of clothes and
footwear; 553 tons of milk powder and baby food.
In a typical week the IDF coordinates the transfer of
hundreds of trucks containing about 15,000 tons of supplies. During the week of
May 18, 2010 there were more than 100 truckloads of animal food, 65 trucks of
fruit and vegetables; 22 truckloads of sugar, some 27 truckloads of meat,
poultry and fish; and 40 trucks of dairy products. At holiday times, Israel
increases transfers. During the Muslim holy days of Ramadhan and Eid al-Adha,
Israel shipped some 11,000 heads of cattle into the Strip.
Yet all we hear from the media is how Israel is oppressing
the people in Gaza.How come we
don't hear about how our federal government has, for decades, been "oppressing"
minorities here.After all, isn't
the aid the Israelis send to Gaza the same as the aid that's given here as free housing, food stamps, free medical care, free cell phones, free cars, unemployment,
federal grants for everything from education to electric wheelchairs, free job
training, etc., etc.?